If you’ve ever wondered what is pop science, you’re not alone. Millions of people worldwide are interested in scientific discoveries, but are unsure how to understand them. Luckily, there’s a simple way to define this kind of news: pop science is the interpretation of science that appeals to the general public. While science journalism tends to focus on recent developments, pop science generally focuses on a broader scope of science.
One of the primary functions of popular science is to make scientific concepts and theories understandable to laypeople. Lay readers are not research-active scientists, so they don’t have access to the original studies that informed these theories. Instead, they must make choices between science narratives that may contradict each other. Pop science is written to be accessible for laypersons, and it is not a substitute for serious study. Therefore, it is important to understand the difference between pop science and pseudoscience.
Public understanding of science is intimately linked to scientific production. Popular images of scientific work are rarely realistic. Pop science typically depicts research and development as an activity that takes place inside labs, rather than as big steps taken in a real lab. Because these public images are not accurate, they can impede scientific progress. Journalists play a vital role in building a realistic image of science. But it’s not that easy.
Pop science is also written by non-scientists. Non-scientists, however, often lack expert knowledge of the topic and aren’t able to spot a misleading popular science article. As a result, pop science can blur the line between real science and pseudoscience. Writers who are technically skilled can also write well in pop science. A writer must have a thorough understanding of the subject and a basic understanding of scientific methods.
In its early years, Discover was an attempt to bridge the gap between scientific American and popular science. It was an amalgam of the two, offering the readability of Pop Science with the coverage of pure science. However, after several changes of ownership, the magazine has lost its skepticism and drifted into speculative science woo. However, the new owner is Bob Guccione, who was previously the editor of Discover magazine.
Another example of a pop science publication is a blog. Some blogs, such as Musings of a Jungle Queen, tackle controversial topics. A recent blog, called the Science of Pop Culture, examines the relationship between genes and culture. Science writers may also be influenced by popular science blogs. But the question remains: what is pop science?? Ultimately, the definition and use of metaphors are not completely clear. It is better to focus on the function of metaphors in pop science.
While popular science magazines tend to cover accepted science literature, you can never completely ignore the fact that these articles are not written by scientists and journalists. They often mix science with other forms of journalism. The best way to write a pop science article is to write it in simple, accessible language. And, of course, don’t use technical jargon. Remember, the average reader doesn’t have the time to read lengthy research articles.